Since we see grooming, support for Hamas, crimes against humanity and drug trafficking all acting to achieve the same goal, maybe it's time to expose some ideas that may be related. In other posts, it has been established how this adversely affected the economy, the price of gas, groceries, rent, utilities, taxes, housing, inflation and an overall increase in the cost of living.
The Radical who shouted "Death to Israel" and "I am Hamas" in 2021-2022 said he was hired by someone named Zanic for graffiti projects in 2018. This was confirmed later on in 2022 when he kept running away from simple questions regarding this matter. If he was hired by someone then was this artist or art group funded by Hamas? Who are they funded by? Was any dissenting speech relating to this classified as misinformation or disinformation? Were they hired as provocateurs or informants based on false accusations? And who exactly was deemed liable for their actions? The guy who exposed them? Sounds like motive to me.
Who contacted the TSA to label innocent people as threats to democracy? Who slid in a false accusation of rape or any other form of abuse? In your mind, does this aid in his ability to secure his family's (including potential family's) well-being or not? Now that we've established the mechanism of this manufactured blame game, lets continue.
Is there a link between this and the initial political donations mentioned earlier, which supposedly bought immunity from prosecution? Who was the beneficiary of this donation? Suspect #1 claimed that his father was the donor. Despite his alleged immunity, he hated police and briefly mentioned ACAB one day in 2010 when he was speaking to someone else. The exact words were "do you know ACAB?" followed by some form of positive acknowledgement. He got in his car, and drove away. In early 2010, he briefly mentioned that his friend knew an artist that hints at women and breaks up relationships with hints to privacy. It seemed unthinkable that this could happen to anyone locally at the time, because the term he used was "Hollywood bitches like Angelina." He was known to exaggerate by his housemates. Even so, he was warned not to try that on the target, by the target, and to his face. How would they even know the rape victim or have her private information? Little did anyone know who was helping them get it. So who was that? Be sure to leave a kissy face in the comments so that we know who are. The tools used to hack emails and monitor them for divulging proprietary information to the public through a smear campaign are used by those who have security clearances. These individuals are supposed to respond positively when being asked if they work for the police or not. This is not what happened here. Unchecked privacy invasions were deliberately allowed for an effort to actively engage in sabotage. Ties to radicals from overseas were overlooked until a death occurred in this story, it would seem. The target did not know that this was going on, nor did he know the deceased person. If this is true, then we've established the intent behind the defamation, and the malice practiced here in order to throw around the term "liable" again. Liable according to who? You? I think not. Did you have this deceased person harassed as well by the same squad, and did they end up murdering this person? While it is sad, it still sounds like a coverup. You'll forgive me if I'm not satisfied with your evaluation skills. If someone says he was not involved, then you cannot do the equivalent of planting evidence just to convict him. Not even a pardon can save such people from God, no matter how much they use TV and ads to convince us otherwise, in my opinion.
The wife of suspect #1 said she was going to work for a politician from the US at one of her campaign events. It turned out that the rape victim even expressed that the separation campaign was initiated by this same politician and one other person who is currently serving a sentence, or so they say on TV. She did say later on that it was not just those 2 people at the top, alluding to a hierarchy of individuals. In the coming weeks after the rape, when suspect #1 got off the phone with a lady, he was asked who it was. He replied with the same name that the rape victim (alleged at the time) had mentioned. According to her after a few months, she claimed that this person who is currently in jail liked the target, and implied that she was excercising her political influence on the both of them. She reported seeing hints on walls and real estate. This is when she was told of suspect #1's claim about the artist, and assured the target that it was not him or suspect #2. In 2019, the target called the RCMP and they confirmed that a rape had occured. This was when it felt like more of an obligation than a choice to speak about this, despite the attacks, both verbal and physical, including financial. It started to make sense why skin-color, religion, race, age, and other dividers were always the main focus of the radicals when practicing provocations. This can also be perceived as indoctrination. How original. Using trauma to impose your rape-motivated ideology onto others. At the time, a continuous heart-attack-like scenario was eating away at any sense of safety that the target had, both for himself and the female target. Now, it's more like a ruptured appendix that needs to be removed. Just to be clear. The radicals and anarchists need to be removed from any position of power, including any affiliation to an entity that has jurisdiction over citizens. This is where the problem originated. Look, if you fantasize about a foreign affair or an exotic fling of any kind, then keep it in your private lives, and don't bring it to the office, because as someone who's views affect policy or policing itself, it is unprofessional to say the least. That should be enough of a reason to stop. Your little addiction to innuendo could in fact adversely influence the decisions of a rape victim in the name of diversity or something, for example. Trampling on people's rights can only be fun for sadists and murderers (while the rapists get to act self-entitled and violently rant about their right to harass through the free speech rule, based on someone being "white"). You'll find that all such people are radicalized against everyday people's actual rights, and will use every form of power to go after whoever they deem harmful to whatever agenda they may have. They've used every excuse, for example, a party of them claimed to hate one religion, and the other party hated the other religion, yet they were both united in their tyrannical cause of suppressing one person, and sabotaging one relationship. Depending on the party speaking, there would be hatred for the religion du jour and they would harass the target for not going against the other religion. It does not matter what race, color or creed you are, but being a completely crazed, bloodthirsty lunatic is where most people should ideally draw the line. I don't care if you were born with a silver spoon in your mouth, or a political donation in your background. If you steal our posessions or private information, hack bank accounts, infringe on our rights, torment our families and sabotage our jobs, then what use are you in a setting which requires morally sound judgement? Who supports you in this sabotage effort?
What would motivate anyone to accuse someone else of crimes they never even committed? What were those crimes? Rape, murder, extortion? Oh wait, that's them doing those things. Who hired street gangs to harass individuals who did nothing wrong? Who owns the movements mentioned below? Does this mean that they support radicals who pretend to be smoke-free, when really they just quit buying because mooching off of others is more friendly to the environment? This begs the question, who started those wildfires that apparently all started with a cigarette? Maybe you should double-check to see if it was the same cigarette every time while you're at it.
This sounds like it could be political, because some of these initiatives in the graffiti appear to show support for these ideas:
"No pipelines" - As in the Keystone XL pipeline?
"EV" - Electric Vehicles?
"Trans" - The trans movement?
"Alpha" - The Alpha bank hoax?
"Gutsy" - Some book written by someone?
Who has plans to devalue life itself and tax everyone to death, in relation to the environment?
The other radical who shouted hatred for white people, Israel and also showed support for Hamas was this politically-connected suspect's closest friend. Incidentally, they were both suspects in the 2010 rape, according to the phonecall made to the police. No confirmation was ever given, and constant denials were enacted at the time. Is the grafitti a means to taunt, provoke and brag to the target about the coverup? Why? Is there an entrapment scheme involved?
Did he (radical suspect #2) have any conversations with the rape victim from 2010? What was said? What deal was made? When exactly? Did he use the secrecy to coerce and intimidate her or try to take advantage of an NDA that was signed, through extortion? When was this? 2010 or 2016? What happened? Was he the one who knew the artist that hints at people with their private information? Why are statements blacked out under FOIP? What is it that is being blacked out?
Comments