The following events occurred at workplaces before and after the attack in 2010. The attack was on May 10th, give or take a day. May 18th was orientation if I'm not mistaken.
2009
Gas station - The toilet brush was not invented back then apparently. A large glove and kitchen roll was given to the future target to clean the toilet. It was done, but it was too much.
Post proposal
Guard - Someone who claimed to be a former President of a country far away was a guard who tried to falsely evaluate an employee and take action against him. It did not work. The lady explained that her neighbor, who liked her but had no chance, worked at the same company.
2010
Organics - Temptress after temptress tries their best. Target remains vigilant and suspects a distraction effort, during the rumors and confrontations.
Newspaper - Boss acts as if he is investigating a rumor over the phone. Lady says that the lady mentioned and seen at heritage house was one of "them". She says quit the job immediately. Target quits at her direction.
Marketing - Temptresses, sudden decline in contracts.
2011
Gift - Unpaid work, false reason created (after the pay period was over). Powerpoint presentation not accepted by owner, after unusually late nights and early mornings at demos for a product that was installed with shelving in 13 stores, in a span of 2 weeks.
Restaurant management- Low pay.
Valet - The target was not fat, but the owner yelled and fat-shamed him while he was on his already post-poned lunch break. His mother told the employees to eat one by one, and they did that. Does the target deserve that kind of degradation in front of your customers?
Depot - Meeting conducted, with strong emphasis on not offering anyone from the store's own team a job. Managers of both teams fight about the use of the order picker. A familiar face asks if the job is good. Target responds positively. He keeps asking for the job. Target says go apply. Manager asks him and he claims that the target was offering him a job. At no point was he offered a job. Both managers send the target home and call him collectively with the accusation. The call ends with a loss of the contract.
Other jobs and interviews - Pushy sales tactics, trashy cheating culture.
2013
Softwood - A contact needed international import/export functions executed via detailed research and negotiation strategies. He needed a certain type of lumber, 200 containers of it per month to be exact. Prices were negotiated with almost every international sawmill that was reachable online. The lady's phonecalls were spiteful at this point. She sent a link to a woodworking website in general and highlighted how she was helping. The target was a little more concerned about who raped her than anything else. That, and the trips made to the Herald, the rumors, the attack, and the coverup.
Ads - Verbal disclaimer made, affirming that the target was not in the media, and had no intention of speaking publicly about the company.
Condo - Constant unfair assessments were made in terms of rent collection. Previous tenants, who were accepted by previous managers (one or 2) were always a few days late. Their prior arrangements with this manager and the company itself were the reasons for late payment. Wages were always delayed after it was clear that the target depended on the job to survive. Some of the most demeaning times were here. The demoralization effort was kicked into overdrive. Tenants seldom received damage deposits back untill they took the company to civil court. Target did not go along with the unfair withholding of damage deposits, despite being pressured and encouraged to make false claims on the inspection reports. Peace officers would call and speak to the target as if he was to blame for the company's actions. Tenants would mostly like the target's style of management. The tenants mainly had a problem with the documented damage deposit holders over there.
Commission-based jobs - Trashy culture, hinting with scenarios and innuendo.
2014
Manager quotes line from private conversations with lady from 2010.
Estimation was sent to the manager without stairs as per her request. The training for the stairs function was not given and therefore could not have completed. The time for the first appointment was less than an hour away, and she said to go as she would add it in. This was held over the target's head throughout the contract. A Home depot contractor commended and praised his estimate as he wanted the carpet in that exact layout. The installers thought that they knew better, and he ended up making them redo the job, to which the manager almost had a problem, but admitted that it was not the target's fault. She brought up the initial mistake (her mistake) when gradually decreasing estimation appointments and eventually ending the contract. She even tried to blame him for the mistake on the day of the ending of the contract. If you reject engaged temptresses, they get pissy I guess. She hinted at private information, and some customers tried to create a strange and also coercive environment during appointments.
Warehouse - Secretary/Temptress appeared on the third day of work, who shared the same name as the lady. She hinted at private information. She and her husband would both treat this particular rejection as an opportunity to sabotage the target's work. The owner understood and the target eventually left. The computers were updated by this time, and the warehouse was reorganized. His job was complete anyway. The lamb is an "intelligent" animal was said by the target at the boss's dinner party.
2015
Interviews - For some reason, ISIS is asked about straight way, but then this turns into a genuine interrogation, as if there was something that the target would know. Alright Sherlock, how about you just get on with the interview before I call you out? The job was "certainly" not for the target, or something to that effect. He was called in for the Business development role, but was sent home thinking that he may have a chance at salesman. But when you leave your door wide open for all employees to hear while you're performing an interrogation, you know he did not expect a callback. This is the opposite of professionalism, and is much more in line with the exhibitionist mentality displayed by the gangs in the other report. You really are a bunch of pole-dancers. What were you trying to do? Be a vigilant citizen by profiling people, based on whatever lame trash movie you saw the night before? What a pile of horse-shit.
Mobile business - The radical who eventually reveals himself in 2021-2022, hints with familiar concepts and pretends that he hates the target in front of all who would talk to him, only behind the target's back. Rumors and confrontations were enacted once again, to further delay the inquiry into 2010. He vows to ruin the target's life, repeated a few more times at other outbursts and provocations by this particular person. This is being mentioned because the online business was kicking off, and it was enraging him as the target was conducting business on his phone. His friends would try to provoke the target but always backed out in the end, because they claimed they were joking. If you think about 2010, how could they be joking?
2016
Home office - Target calls tax people and the representative states that anything under $10,000 should not be considered tax-worthy. Even so, sales were conducted on e-commerce websites where tax is paid to those websites by both the buyer and seller, so that was not an issue.
2017
Airport questions -
Airport 1 - Misleading questions detected but answered properly, despite the attempt at deliberate confusion. SIM cards mysteriously went missing.
Airport 2 - Proprietary details given in front of other travellers, as if there was some reason for concern.
2019
Hearing - Exchange mysteriously filed as a return. Nail placed under tire. Secretary who now worked at an office which was run by rotating staff, missed working at her private office far away from the head office.
2022
Meat - City closes food business. Employees get dismissal letters to avoid layoffs for some reason. Standard scammer crap. Owner brags about not spelling her name correctly on employment offer letter. She sabotages the work, then goes on to manipulate a government document. Crowd cheers for how smart she is, right? That's the culture now. Rape legitimization at it's best.
Meat 2 - Wet chicken was to be cut into small pieces on the bandsaw, because even something as small as chicken is considered as large as a moose in some places. How did they clean the bandsaw? They lightly brushed it with a paintbrush at the end of the day, with all of yesterday's crap being caked into the sides. These are health violations, in my opinion.
Why use a paintbrush? Gaslighting much? Such businesses thrive in Calgary, and for a reason. There's something terribly wrong here.
Clinic - Solicitation is not allowed in most businesses. The target was hired at $60,000 a year for a clinic. Advertising their blood-pressure monitors and their clinical services was part of the job. There are other examples of this in his employment history, but he had to leave due to the job including uninvited solicitation. Going into different businesses and bending the rules to advertise the services in their workspace is essentially giving a sales pitch where it is not allowed. Why should he be the face of your company? He quit on his own, giving up the lucrative salary. Even that was considered lucrative because of the constant job sabotage over the years. You should really be ashamed of yourselves.
Of course there are others which I don't count, because even these are enough to suggest that your motivation lies in sabotage, disenfranchisement and of course, encouraging attempts on people's lives. The meat-cutting role in Calgary was an indictment on your malice, so don't even try it.
Bank account hacking:
Once in 2021, and twice in 2022 (Censorship)
Comments