Once the rapists and violent repeat offenders are simply removed from positions of political importance, and have no access to people's privacy, we can expect a fair process whereby society can rebuild itself. Such people consider their rape and targeting scheme as taking action, so yes, that is where mental health concerns should idealy evolve into criminal concerns. It is at this point that we should consider that this person is okay with violating someone else's right to feel safe and secure in their respective community, in a genuine way. The ability to rape a woman, sabotage her potential family and then use lawfare against someone without say, a fair trial is where I would ideally start the inquiry, but you can't expect everyone to be non-treasonous.
Sometimes, gangs who target unsuspecting civilians get recruited into our institutions because someone with a DEI badge watches too many gangster movies it seems. Would you like to have a fighter pilot that targets or allows the targeting of unsuspecting residents of their own town, city or country? Sounds like a patriot to me. You know who you are. Judging by the fentanyl story, I'd say you snorted too much coke one day and decided to have scarface maverick over here become a secret informant, and then got so high that you decided to make him a pilot. Is this the training given at the academy? Obviously not, but this would be the type of question that would follow such a clown show. So when the fighter jets spray out that white stuff, is it actually fentanyl? This pilot was the one who introduced the target to these people. He would ask questions such as, "Are you serious about this lady?" He also said, "These guys just waste people's time" after the introduction. Well, he was right, and I'm glad we know what a guilty conscience sounds like. Would you care to elaborate next time so that targets don't get blamed for your unwarranted surveillance, or some death that occurs at the hands of your street gangs? So was the plan to have her trafficked out with the full support of your employers, while falsely accusing the target of crimes he never committed? While you obviously had the wind blowing in your hair (he's bald) did it occur to you that the person you targeted might remember that you once mentioned a group of people that hang out at the college parking lot, and that you would need money to hang out with them? Was this group the same ACAB that smeared private information from phonecalls and business communications on walls? Interesting. If this is true, then it has been established. Getting tired after focusing on arms at the gym is the requirement. Make sure you look like a ghetto thug first, and try to make a quick buck being a false informant. Maybe this is why the anti-white rhetoric became normalized. This would make sense because this was the first person to talk like that. The profile on Twitter that was linked to her was his friend from Toronto, according to one single phonecall which he made, directing the target to check him out on Twitter. He said, "it's a joke", but did not specify anything else. Funny how that works. Here we were trying to find a connection to 2010, when it started in 2009. So this targeting was started to due blind faith in our institutions, and trusting that they must have hired him on merit. Is this was happened?
As for the demoralization effort, it seems to have been their calling card since 2009 or early 2010 at the latest. They would go out of their way to act out little scenarios. Women who happened to be caucasian acted as if they were "unchaste" to say the least. Maybe they were, but the target had refused to believe this about every single white woman. The idea that was common across all of them was slander, and going against the target for potentially being "naive" enough to trust this white woman, based on her skin color. So when one of them was shunned, the other would start. When he was confronted, another would be invited into the story to make up another story about a white woman cheating or being sleazy. The funny thing is the identity crisis that plagued these people. Most of the women in their families had a white skin-tone, and you can bet that the target never gave up the opportunity to point this out. It seemed like a good idea at the time to give them a taste of their own medicine, and it still does. Some of us like to stand up for ourselves in the face of a race-based slander, however, this would also be the intended result of those that engaged in violence against the target. The mere mentioning of any woman from their lives was a guaranteed reason to commit violence, enacted in an inauthentic form of outrage, the kind that you do for cameras while acting (pun intended). The thing is, if you insult someone's girlfriend and expect him to just take it, then you're in the wrong country. If you're engaged in a clear entrapment operation, but instead are the first to make a threat or commit an act of violence, then why is your statement blacked out under FOIP? Is someone aiding and abetting you? Who? Why? So you associate the target with Israel based on his choice for marriage, and use this as an excuse to commit entrapment with all of your radicals? If you live in Canada, then who validates this behavior for you and your gang-bangers (another pun intended)? The budget you received in cash is the amount you should be talking about. Where did the payment come from? Why was it off-the-record? Or did mach 5 over there get you the funding?
The other thing is claiming to change your religion. It was not enough that you were obviously undecided in your fundamentals. Whoever hired you for such a sensitive entrapment operation overlooked the clear hints at unlawful surveillance communicated here, and thought nobody would find out. As you can clearly see below, Bible verses were used as an encoded communication tool, the kind that any peeping Tom would use if he was involved in a grooming effort. Have you found yourself yet?
You could be falsely accused of rape and not even know about it for 9 years at a time. We know this from experience in letting criminally-motivated gangs abuse the system time and time again. Just because some of you have financial arrangements with them for divulging someone else's private information (after it was obtained in an illegal manner), it does not actually make you judge, jury and executioner when speaking about the target. The most commonly-used excuse is somehow relationships and breakups. If those grievances (not a reference to recent reporting) make your mind automatically assume the person's guilt, or incline you towards making that call, then you are by default assuming the person's ability to justify his alleged actions, when that is hardly ever the case. You are more likely to accuse someone of a crime they never committed based on grievance. Therein lies the problem. Not everything is a soap opera. In the event he was actually guilty, you would have now coddled the criminal even though he was just mentally defficient with a thirst for anarchy, and you've now given his outbreak an emotional justification. Events like this encourage those who have something to hide, or accuse their ex of doing something that he or she never did, for example. This is an incentive for destroying relationships in the big picture. The separation of man and wife, because of the benefit to be gained from drawing attention to the relationship. You really are sick people.
This is why, in my opinion, English literature is the worst subject to teach at schools. Who cares what Lady Macbeth was thinking? She did commit a murder did she not? Dumbass. In a real life scenario, ask her after you've convicted the bitch. Society is such a watered down version of itself, you'd make fiction writers like Shakespeare roll around in their graves because of how demented you've become over plays that they wrote. It is those dead writers or their descendants who, if they could, should file restraining orders against the academics who think they know what should be taught in schools. And we as previous adolescents were to be graded in our final exams based on your psychotic shit? Yeah, that's a fair education system if I ever saw one. Let's see what the wise Lady of Bath has to say when your child's academic future is at stake.
This only feeds your need to pretend to be God and affect an innocent person's life in a negative way, based on nothing. When looked at under a microscope, you seem to have a sadistic thirst for torturing the innocent, in this case being Canadian taxpayers. It shows on your smug faces everytime you open your mouths.
False reporting is the root cause of the downfall of the economy. Advocating for the death penalty of an innocent person who did nothing wrong plays a role as well.
Lying.
Back to the future:
Oil and Gas, starting with the Keystone XL Pipeline should be the priority. There is no sense in not extracting the oil from reserves already present in the ground. Coal is another one. This will strengthen jobs and the economy as a whole in a purely organic way. It's the people of Canada that can make this happen, regardless of which political party is in power. Voice your concerns and let your public office know that you need the oil and gas industry back. Get permits for mining, minerals and metallurgy fast-tracked, and actually do a good job of voting for the things you need to get this country going. Stop buying into the hype. Imagine a country who is self-sufficient in agriculture, forestry, mining, fishing, and best of all, making parts for automobiles, machinery and other equipment. We must strive to do this, as should every other country.
As a supplement, try researching thorium, magnetic energy and other types of resources. Depending on those for electricity may indeed be another story, but I'll let the engineers and physicists figure that one out. I am in no way a scientist, but I do know that you can make things better than they are now only through coal, oil and natural gas because these are immediate remedies to the loss in economic growth which we have faced since the collective recession of 2008 and 2023, post-pandemic.
In order to be positive, you must remove the negative.
Bring Canada Back
Comments